|
The Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
icddr,b
ISSN: 1606-0997 EISSN: 1606-0997
Vol. 31, No. s2, 2013, pp. 48-66
|
Bioline Code: hn13078
Full paper language: English
Document type: Research Article
Document available free of charge
|
|
The Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, Vol. 31, No. s2, 2013, pp. 48-66
en |
Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Maternal and Newborn Health
Glassman, Amanda; Duran, Denizhan; Fleisher, Lisa; Singer, Daniel; Sturke, Rachel; Angeles, Gustavo; Charles, Jodi; Emrey, Bob; Gleason, Joanne; Mwebsa, Winnie; Saldana, Kelly; Yarrow, Kristina & Koblinsky, Marge
Abstract
Maternal and newborn health (MNH) is a high priority for global health and is included among the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs). However, the slow decline in maternal and newborn mortality jeopardizes
achievements of the targets of MDGs. According to UNICEF, 60 million women give birth outside
of health facilities, and family planning needs are satisfied for only 50%. Further, skilled birth attendance
and the use of antenatal care are most inequitably distributed in maternal and newborn health interventions
in low- and middle-income countries. Conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes have been
shown to increase health service utilization among the poorest but little is written on the effects of such
programmes on maternal and newborn health. We carried out a systematic review of studies on CCT that
report maternal and newborn health outcomes, including studies from 8 countries. The CCT programmes
have increased antenatal visits, skilled attendance at birth, delivery at a health facility, and tetanus toxoid
vaccination for mothers and reduced the incidence of low birthweight. The programmes have not had a
significant impact on fertility while the impact on maternal and newborn mortality has not been welldocumented
thus far. Given these positive effects, we make the case for further investment in CCT programmes
for maternal and newborn health, noting gaps in knowledge and providing recommendations
for better design and evaluation of such programmes. We recommend more rigorous impact evaluations
that document impact pathways and take factors, such as cost-effectiveness, into account.
Keywords
Conditional cash transfers; Global health; Incentives; Maternal health; Millennium Development Goals; Newborn health; Social protection
|
|
© The Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition Alternative site location: http://www.jhpn.net
|
|