|
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 96(5) July 2001, pp. 729-732 Resistance of Musca domestica L. Populations to Cyromazine (Insect Growth Regulator) in Brazil Mara Cristina Pinto+, Angelo Pires do Prado Departamento de Parasitologia,
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Cidade Universitária
s/n, Caixa Postal 6109, 13083-970 Campinas, SP, Brasil Received 14 August 2000 Code Number: oc01116 Five field populations of Musca domestica L. collected in poultry farms were bioassayed in order to detect possible resistance to the larvicide cyromazine in Brazil. The concentrations used were 0, 0.5, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 1, 2, 4 and 8 ppm. Three populations (Petrópolis, RJ, Montes Claros, MG and Promissão, SP) were resistant, while the other two populations (Ibiuna, SP and Monte Mor, SP) were more susceptible than the reference pathern used by the World Health Organization. The presence of three resistant house fly populations to cyromazine in Brazilian poultry farms strongly suggests that the operational aspects of larvicide use are important for the resistance development. Cyromazine is applied as a feed-through, both in Brazil and in the USA, where resistance has already been documented. However, in Denmark, where it was approved only as a topical manure spray, no case of resistance has yet been detected. Key words: Musca domestica - larvicide - resistance - insect growth regulator - cyromazine - poultry farms Insect growth regulators (IGR) were believed to be on the safe side regarding the evolution of resistance (Williams 1967). However, various studies have shown that resistance can evolve in response to this chemical group (Cerf & Georghiou 1972, Dyte 1972), moreover if the selection pressure is sufficiently strong (Keiding 1999). The method of insecticide application is an operational factor that can induce the resistance development. Cyromazine (N-cyclopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine) is a new class of IGR derived from azidotriazine herbicides (Shen & Plapp 1990) causing death to larvae or deformation to pupae (Friedel & McDonell 1985). In poultry farms it has been used for the control of manure-breeding flies, (especially house flies Musca domestica L.) in two ways: feed-through larvicide or as a spray applied over the manure. Since cyromazine feed-through was first used in USA poultry farms in the 80s, reports have shown the development of resistance or tolerance in populations of house flies (Iseki & Georghiou 1986, Bloomcamp et al. 1987, Sheppard et al. 1989, 1992). In Danish poultry farms, however, where it has been used as a topical manure spray since 1984, no case of resistance in house flies has been documented (Jespersen 1990, Keiding et al. 1992). In Brazil, this product has also been used since 1984 as a feed-through although no study has been carried out to assess the susceptibility of M. domestica. In 1992, with the objective of evaluating the level of susceptibility to cyromazine in this country, we compared five house fly field populations through the use of a dose-response test. MATERIALS AND METHODS Maintenance of insects - House flies were captured using an entomological net in five widely separated poultry farms situated at the following Brazilian cities: Petrópolis, RJ, Promissão, SP, Ibiuna, SP, Monte Mor, SP and Montes Claros, MG. In these farms, cyromazine had been carried out for six to eight years and problems controlling the house flies had been observed. In the laboratory, M. domestica adults were separated from the other flies and fed a 1:1:1 mixture of sugar, powdered milk and yeast. Eggs of the second or third generation were collected from cages and cultured in a fermented larval medium which consisted of 35% of animal ration plus 65% parts of water. Bioassay - Cyromazine (Ciba), a powdered product, was dissolved in the water used to make the larval medium. Initially, cyromazine was applied to all five populations in concentrations of 1, 2, 4 and 8 parts per million (ppm). Two populations (Monte Mor and Ibiuna) which had 100% of mortality in 1 ppm, were retested with the following concentrations: 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 ppm. Treated medium was allocated in plastic containers with 100 g in each, with each concentration replicated four times. Untreated medium was used as a control, with the same number of replications. Samples of 100 larvae obtained a few hours after hatching were placed in each container. RESULTS Bioassays indicated the presence of resistance to cyromazine in three out of five house fly populations at different sites in Brazil. Populations from Petrópolis, Montes Claros and Promissão were resistant to cyromazine whereas the populations from Ibiuna and Monte Mor were even more sensitive than the WHO susceptible pattern (Table I). RR varied from 12.8 fold on the most resistant population to 0.24 fold on the most sensitive population. The confidence intervals at LC50 of the two most resistant populations, Petrópolis and Montes Claros, overlapped indicating indistinguishable levels of resistance. However an intermediate level of resistance was detected on Promissão population when compared to the two most resistant and the two most sensitive populations (Figure). DISCUSSION The term "resistance" is used in this paper with the same reservations expressed by Pap and Farkas (1994). According to these authors resistance is a genetic phenomenon that should be studied in an intergeneration context, and the lethal concentrations relate only phenotypic tolerance. In spite of this, the use of the term "resistance" has been widely used in an operational sense. Our study detected for the first time the presence of resistance to cyromazine in Brazil in three out of five house fly populations evaluated. However, it is not possible to explain these differences found in terms of the history of cyromazine application in each site, as in all poultry farms surveyed, cyromazine had been applied as a feed-through for six years on the two sensitive populations, and one or two years more on the others. The interaction between insects and insecticides involves genetic, biological and operational factors (Georghiou & Taylor 1977a,b) and the demonstration of resistance in a certain local may just reflect a temporary situation. Seasonal variation and metapopulation model studies suggest this provisional condition. Progenies of M. domestica collected during a year showed seasonal variation in sensitivity to insecticides (Oliveira et al. 1993). In a metapopulation model, a large stable population is subdivided into many local populations, each of which is unstable. Extinction and recolonization events can increase genetic differentiation among populations (Caprio & Hoy 1994). Apart from the temporary aspects mentioned above, related to the documentation of resistance, the methodology applied on bioassay may also be highlighted. The use of dose/response is an adequate way to document resistance that has reached high levels, but is inefficient for detection of an incipient resistance outbreak (Roush & Miller 1986). It is possible, therefore, that the two sensitive populations have resistant genes in low frequencies. The method of cyromazine application in Brazilian poultry farms is the same as that used in the USA, namely feed-through. Bloomcamp et al. (1987) detected resistance in one Florida poultry farm where cyromazine had been used for two seasons. Sheppard et al. (1992) found that, in one Mississipi poultry farm house, flies became three times more resistant after two years of cyromazine use. Moderate to high resistance to cyromazine develops if the selection pressure is strong enough, as in the case of feed-through treatments (Keiding 1999). It is of particular significance to this study that resistance has not been shown (as yet) in Denmark. In that country, cyromazine has not been authorized for use as a feed-through; it has been used only as a topical manure spray (Keiding et al. 1992). The direct treatment of the manure leaves some parts without larvicide, permitting the survival of susceptible individuals to dilute the resistance (Sheppard et al. 1989). As stressed by Axtell (1986), an integrated control program in poultry farms requires cultural, biological and chemical methods, however fly resistance to insecticides often develops rapidly and many chemicals used in the past are no longer effective. Cyromazine is a powerful chemical method because cross-resistance with other conventional insecticides, e.g. organophosphorous and py-retroids has not yet been found in the various countries it has been used, such as the USA (Iseki & Georghiou 1986), Denmark (Keiding et al. 1991), Hungary (Pap & Farkas 1994) and Germany (Pospischil et al. 1996). Adding this advantage to ways of delaying or avoiding resistance make this larvicide an useful tool for house fly control. This study gives additional support to the importance of the operational methods of cyromazine application on the resistance process development. ACKNOWLEGMENTS To Diarmid Campbell Lendrum and Marcelo Duarte for helpful comments on the manuscript. REFERENCES
Copyright 2001 Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz The following images related to this document are available:Photo images[oc01116t1.jpg] [oc01116f1.jpg] |
|