search
for
 About Bioline  All Journals  Testimonials  Membership  News


Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management
World Bank assisted National Agricultural Research Project (NARP) - University of Port Harcourt
ISSN: 1119-8362
Vol. 24, No. 2, 2020, pp. 249-252
Bioline Code: ja20036
Full paper language: English
Document type: Research Article
Document available free of charge

Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2020, pp. 249-252

 en Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Ethanol Extracts of Fresh Citrus sinensis check for this species in other resources (Sweet Orange) Seeds against Selected Bacterial Strains
OIKEH, EI; OVIASOGIE, FE & OMOREGIE, ES

Abstract

The antibacterial activities of fresh Citrus sinensis seed oil and non-oil extract are investigated in this study. Gram positive ( Staphylococcus aureus check for this species in other resources and Enterococcus faecalis check for this species in other resources ) and Gram negative ( Pseudomonas aeruginosa check for this species in other resources , Escherichia coli check for this species in other resources and Salmonella spp.) bacterial strains are used in this study and antibacterial activity is estimated using the agar well diffusion method. Zones of inhibition were measured and the minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bacteriostatic concentrations were determined. The results show that the non-oil extract had better antibacterial activities against Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli compared to the oil extract (zones of inhibition at 200 μg/ml of 12 mm, 8 mm and 2 mm respectively for the non- oil extract; 4 mm, 6 mm, 0 mm respectively for the seed oil). The seed oil however had better antibacterial activity compared to the non-oil extract in Salmonella spp. (zones of inhibition at 200 μg/ml of 8 mm for the seed oil compared to 4 mm for the non-oil extract). Pseudomonas aeruginosa showed similar susceptibility to both extracts at both concentrations studied (zones of inhibition of 4 mm and 2 mm for both extracts at 200 μg/ml and 100 200 μg/ml respectively). Minimum inhibitory concentrations ranged from 50 – 100 μg/ml while minimum bacteriostatic concentrations ranged from 100 – 200 μg/ml. We conclude from our findings that both extracts hold promise in the development of antimicrobial therapeutics.

Keywords
Citrus sinensis; Antibacterial; minimum inhibitory concentration; minimum bacteriostatic concentration

 
© Copyright 2020 - Oikeh et al.

Home Faq Resources Email Bioline
© Bioline International, 1989 - 2024, Site last up-dated on 01-Sep-2022.
Site created and maintained by the Reference Center on Environmental Information, CRIA, Brazil
System hosted by the Google Cloud Platform, GCP, Brazil