|
Tanzania Journal of Health Research
Health User's Trust Fund (HRUTF)
ISSN: 1821-6404
Vol. 14, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1-8
|
Bioline Code: th12036
Full paper language: English
Document type: Research Article
Document available free of charge
|
|
Tanzania Journal of Health Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1-8
en |
Audit of clinical-laboratory practices in haematology and blood transfusion at Muhimbili National Hospital in Tanzania
MAKUB, ABEL N.; MEDA, COLLINS; MAGESA, ALEX; MINJA, PETER; MLALAS, JULIANA; SALUM, ZUBEDA; KWEKA, RUMISHA E.; RWEHABURA, JAMES; QUARESH, AMRANA; MAGESA, PIUS M.; ROBERT, DAVID; MAKANI, JULIE & KAAYA, EPHATA
Abstract
In Tanzania, there is paucity of data for monitoring laboratory medicine including haematology.
This therefore calls for audits of practices in haematology and blood transfusion in order to provide
appraise practice and devise strategies that would result in improved quality of health care services. This
descriptive cross-sectional study which audited laboratory practice in haematology and blood transfusion
at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH) aimed at assessing the pre-analytical stage of laboratory
investigations including laboratory request forms and handling specimen processing in the haematology
laboratory and assessing the chain from donor selection, blood component processing to administration
of blood during transfusion. A national standard checklist was used to audit the laboratory request forms
(LRF), phlebotomists’ practices on handling and assessing the from donor selection to administration of
blood during transfusion. Both interview and observations were used. A total of 195 LRF were audited
and 100% of had incomplete information such as patients’ identification numbers, time sample ordered,
reason for request, summary of clinical assessment and differential diagnoses. The labelling of specimens
was poorly done by phlebotomists/clinicians in 82% of the specimens. Also 65% (132/202) of the blood
samples delivered in the haematology laboratory did not contain the recommended volume of blood.
There was no laboratory request form specific for ordering blood and there were no guidelines for
indication of blood transfusion in the wards/clinics. The blood transfusion laboratory section was not
participating in external quality assessment and the hospital transfusion committee was not in operation.
It is recommended that a referral hospital like MNH should have a transfusion committee to provide an
active forum to facilitate communication between those involved with transfusion, monitor, coordinate
and audit blood transfusion practices as per national guidelines.
Keywords
audit; laboratory; haematology; practices; hospital; Tanzania
|
|
© Tanzania Journal of Health Research
|
|